I create a jira for the release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-774 please add blockers to that jira if they need to be in the release.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you guys intend to release convenience binaries in addition to the > initial source release? If so, I think you'll have to include a > license/notice that includes the third party dependencies. > > Also, license should be used to record third-party licensed works that are > included in the source distribution. The bit packing code should be in > there, rather than in notice. Notice is for required third-party notices > and isn't the file where third-party licensing information should be > accumulated. > > rb > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Wes McKinney <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think we are ready to make a release once PARQUET-702 is merged. Is > > there any more licensing / NOTICE review work to do? > > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Deepak Majeti <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > I would like to get PARQUET-764 and PARQUET-702 into the release as > > > well. Both of them belong to me. > > > I plan to finish PARQUET-702 by Monday. > > > If someone can take over PARQUET-764, it will be easier. > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Uwe Korn <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> given that we have reached a point parquet-cpp is working quite nicely > > and a > > >> minimal set of features is implemented, I would like to continue to > > make a > > >> release in the next days. I would wait for PARQUET-726 [1] to be > merged > > and > > >> then setup the release scripts and ask for a vote. > > >> > > >> Is there anything else someone wants to get in before the initial > > release? > > >> > > >> Uwe > > >> > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-cpp/pull/184 > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > regards, > > > Deepak Majeti > > > > > > -- > Ryan Blue > Software Engineer > Netflix > -- Julien
