ASF GitHub Bot commented on PARQUET-1166:

advancedxy commented on a change in pull request #445: [WIP] PARQUET-1166: Add 
GetRecordBatchReader in parquet/arrow/reader
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-cpp/pull/445#discussion_r171237865

 File path: src/parquet/arrow/writer.h
 @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ namespace arrow {
 class Array;
 class MemoryPool;
 class PrimitiveArray;
-class RowBatch;
 Review comment:
   RowBatch is never used any more and is renamed to RecordBatch

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:

> [API Proposal] Add GetRecordBatchReader in parquet/arrow/reader.h
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: PARQUET-1166
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1166
>             Project: Parquet
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: parquet-cpp
>            Reporter: Xianjin YE
>            Priority: Major
> Hi, I'd like to proposal a new API to better support splittable reading for 
> Parquet File.
> The intent for this API is that we can selective reading RowGroups(normally 
> be contiguous, but can be arbitrary as long as the row_group_idxes are sorted 
> and unique, [1, 3, 5] for example). 
> The proposed API would be something like this:
> {code:java}
> ::arrow::Status GetRecordBatchReader(const std::vector<int>& 
> row_group_indices,
> std::shared_ptr<::arrow::RecordBatchReader>* out);
> ::arrow::Status GetRecordBatchReader(const std::vector<int>& 
> row_group_indices,
>                                                                 const 
> std::vector<int>& column_indices,
> std::shared_ptr<::arrow::RecordBatchReader>* out);
> {code}
> With new API, we can split Parquet file into RowGroups and can be processed 
> by multiple tasks(maybe be on different hosts, like the Map task in MapReduce)
> [~wesmckinn][~xhochy] What do you think?

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

Reply via email to