[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16585291#comment-16585291
 ] 

Jonathan Underwood commented on PARQUET-1241:
---------------------------------------------

[~ee07b291] - not sure there's any need for separate tickets (I have no strong 
feeling either way-I'm not a contributor!), I just wanted to make sure everyone 
was on the same page.

> Use LZ4 frame format
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: PARQUET-1241
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1241
>             Project: Parquet
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: parquet-cpp, parquet-format
>            Reporter: Lawrence Chan
>            Priority: Major
>
> The parquet-format spec doesn't currently specify whether lz4-compressed data 
> should be framed or not. We should choose one and make it explicit in the 
> spec, as they are not inter-operable. After some discussions with others [1], 
> we think it would be beneficial to use the framed format, which adds a small 
> header in exchange for more self-contained decompression as well as a richer 
> feature set (checksums, parallel decompression, etc).
> The current arrow implementation compresses using the lz4 block format, and 
> this would need to be updated when we add the spec clarification.
> If backwards compatibility is a concern, I would suggest adding an additional 
> LZ4_FRAMED compression type, but that may be more noise than anything.
> [1] https://github.com/dask/fastparquet/issues/314



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to