That is fine with me. On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 2:32 AM Uwe L. Korn <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018, at 1:05 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote: > > What does archiving the master branch look like? Are we renaming master and > > leaving a readme pointing to the new repo? > > That would be my preferred option. Any objections?
- Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Moving Apache Parquet C++ development pr... Wes McKinney
- Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Moving Apache Parquet C++ developme... Wes McKinney
- Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Moving Apache Parquet C++ devel... Wes McKinney
- Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Moving Apache Parquet C++ d... Wes McKinney
- Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Moving Apache Parquet C... Wes McKinney
- Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Moving Apache Parquet C... Wes McKinney
- Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Moving Apache Parquet C... Uwe L. Korn
- Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Moving Apache Parquet C... Wes McKinney
- Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Moving Apache Parquet C... Julien Le Dem
- Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Moving Apache Parquet C... Uwe L. Korn
- Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Moving Apache Parquet C... Wes McKinney
