[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17013530#comment-17013530
]
Antoine Pitrou commented on PARQUET-1698:
-----------------------------------------
[~lidavidm] You're talking about your S3 file implementation. Have you tried
using the Arrow S3 implementation?
Would the following kind of API on {{RandomAccessFile}} satisfy your use case?
{code:cpp}
struct ReadRegion {
int64_t position;
int64_t size;
};
Result<std::vector<std::shared_ptr<Buffer>>
ReadMultiple(const std::vector<ReadRegion>& regions);
{code}
> [C++] Add reader option to pre-buffer entire serialized row group into memory
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PARQUET-1698
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1698
> Project: Parquet
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: parquet-cpp
> Reporter: Wes McKinney
> Assignee: Zherui Cao
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: cpp-1.6.0
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In some scenarios (example: reading datasets from Amazon S3), reading columns
> independently and allowing unbridled {{Read}} calls to the underlying file
> handle can yield suboptimal performance. In such cases, it may be preferable
> to first read the entire serialized row group into memory then deserialize
> the constituent columns from this
> Note that such an option would not be appropriate as a default behavior for
> all file handle types since low-selectivity reads (example: reading only 3
> columns out of a file with 100 columns) will be suboptimal in some cases. I
> think it would be better for "high latency" file systems to opt into this
> option
> cc [~fsaintjacques] [~bkietz] [~apitrou]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
