Hi,
I can help too.
Lukas

Dne pá 24. 1. 2020 15:29 uživatel David Mollitor <[email protected]> napsal:

> Hello Team,
>
> I am happy to do the work of reviewing all Parquet logging, but I need help
> getting the work committed.
>
> Fokko Driesprong has been a wonderfully ally in helping me get incremental
> improvements into Parquet, but I wonder if there's anyone else that can
> share in the load.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:55 AM Michael Heuer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello David,
> >
> > As I mentioned on PARQUET-1758, we have been frustrated by overly verbose
> > logging in Parquet for a long time.  Various workarounds have been more
> or
> > less successful, e.g.
> >
> > https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam/issues/851 <
> > https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam/issues/851>
> >
> > I would support a move making Parquet a silent partner.  :)
> >
> >    michael
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 23, 2020, at 10:25 AM, David Mollitor <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Team,
> > >
> > > I have been a consumer of Apache Parquet through Apache Hive for
> several
> > > years now.  For a long time, logging in Parquet has been pretty
> painful.
> > > Some of the logging was going to STDOUT and some was going to Log4J.
> > > Overall, though the framework has been too verbose, spewing many log
> > lines
> > > about internal details of Parquet I don't understand.
> > >
> > > The logging has gotten a lot better with recent releases moving solidly
> > > into SLF4J.  That is awesome and very welcomed.  However, (opinion
> > alert) I
> > > think the logging is still too verbose.  I think Parquet should be a
> > silent
> > > partner in data processing.  If everything is going well, it should be
> > > silent (DEBUG level logging).  If things are going wrong, it should
> throw
> > > an Exception.
> > >
> > > If an operator suspects Parquet is the issue (and that's rarely the
> first
> > > thing to check), they can set the logging for all of the Loggers in the
> > > entire Parquet package (org.apache.parquet) to DEBUG to get the
> required
> > > information.  Not to mention, the less logging it does, the faster it
> > will
> > > be.
> > >
> > > I've opened this discussion because I've got two PRs related to this
> > topic
> > > ready to go:
> > >
> > > PARQUET-1758
> > > PARQUET-1761
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > David
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to