[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17242547#comment-17242547 ]
Gabor Szadovszky commented on PARQUET-1666: ------------------------------------------- [~julienledem], [~sha...@uber.com], what is the status of this? Do we want to drop Hive modules in 1.12.0? What about Scrooge? I think, the deprecation in the module description is not enough. The users won't catch it. I think it would be a better way to add "-deprecated" suffix to the artifact name so the users have to rename their dependencies when upgrading parquet. What do you think? > Remove Unused Modules > ---------------------- > > Key: PARQUET-1666 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1666 > Project: Parquet > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: parquet-mr > Affects Versions: 1.12.0 > Reporter: Xinli Shang > Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.12.0 > > > In the last two meetings, Ryan Blue proposed to remove some unused Parquet > modules. This is to open a task to track it. > Here are the related meeting notes for the discussion on this. > Remove old Parquet modules > Hive modules - sounds good > Scooge - Julien will reach out to twitter > Tools - undecided - Cloudera may still use the parquet-tools according to > Gabor. > Cascading - undecided > We can change the module as deprecated as description. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)