[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17242547#comment-17242547
]
Gabor Szadovszky commented on PARQUET-1666:
-------------------------------------------
[~julienledem], [[email protected]], what is the status of this? Do we want to
drop Hive modules in 1.12.0? What about Scrooge?
I think, the deprecation in the module description is not enough. The users
won't catch it. I think it would be a better way to add "-deprecated" suffix to
the artifact name so the users have to rename their dependencies when upgrading
parquet. What do you think?
> Remove Unused Modules
> ----------------------
>
> Key: PARQUET-1666
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1666
> Project: Parquet
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: parquet-mr
> Affects Versions: 1.12.0
> Reporter: Xinli Shang
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.12.0
>
>
> In the last two meetings, Ryan Blue proposed to remove some unused Parquet
> modules. This is to open a task to track it.
> Here are the related meeting notes for the discussion on this.
> Remove old Parquet modules
> Hive modules - sounds good
> Scooge - Julien will reach out to twitter
> Tools - undecided - Cloudera may still use the parquet-tools according to
> Gabor.
> Cascading - undecided
> We can change the module as deprecated as description.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
