[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17582613#comment-17582613
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PARQUET-1711:
-----------------------------------------

shangxinli commented on code in PR #988:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/988#discussion_r950887905


##########
parquet-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/parquet/proto/ProtoSchemaConverter.java:
##########
@@ -79,12 +80,20 @@ public MessageType convert(Class<? extends Message> 
protobufClass) {
   }
 
   /* Iterates over list of fields. **/
-  private <T> GroupBuilder<T> convertFields(GroupBuilder<T> groupBuilder, 
List<FieldDescriptor> fieldDescriptors) {
+  private <T> GroupBuilder<T> convertFields(GroupBuilder<T> groupBuilder, 
List<FieldDescriptor> fieldDescriptors, List<String> parentNames) {
     for (FieldDescriptor fieldDescriptor : fieldDescriptors) {
-      groupBuilder =
-          addField(fieldDescriptor, groupBuilder)
+      final String name = fieldDescriptor.getFullName();
+      final List<String> newParentNames = new ArrayList<>(parentNames);
+      newParentNames.add(name);
+      if (parentNames.contains(name)) {

Review Comment:
   The list contains would be slower than HashSet. Any reason we don't use 
HashSet? 





> [parquet-protobuf] stack overflow when work with well known json type
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PARQUET-1711
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1711
>             Project: Parquet
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.10.1
>            Reporter: Lawrence He
>            Priority: Major
>
> Writing following protobuf message as parquet file is not possible: 
> {code:java}
> syntax = "proto3";
> import "google/protobuf/struct.proto";
> package test;
> option java_outer_classname = "CustomMessage";
> message TestMessage {
>     map<string, google.protobuf.ListValue> data = 1;
> } {code}
> Protobuf introduced "well known json type" such like 
> [ListValue|https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/google.protobuf#listvalue]
>  to work around json schema conversion. 
> However writing above messages traps parquet writer into an infinite loop due 
> to the "general type" support in protobuf. Current implementation will keep 
> referencing 6 possible types defined in protobuf (null, bool, number, string, 
> struct, list) and entering infinite loop when referencing "struct".
> {code:java}
> java.lang.StackOverflowErrorjava.lang.StackOverflowError at 
> java.base/java.util.Arrays$ArrayItr.<init>(Arrays.java:4418) at 
> java.base/java.util.Arrays$ArrayList.iterator(Arrays.java:4410) at 
> java.base/java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection$1.<init>(Collections.java:1044)
>  at 
> java.base/java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection.iterator(Collections.java:1043)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.convertFields(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:64)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.addField(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:96)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.convertFields(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:66)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.addField(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:96)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.convertFields(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:66)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.addField(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:96)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.convertFields(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:66)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.addField(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:96)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.convertFields(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:66)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.addField(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:96)
>  {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to