[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17614882#comment-17614882
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PARQUET-1711:
-----------------------------------------

jinyius commented on code in PR #995:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/995#discussion_r990912850


##########
parquet-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/parquet/proto/ProtoSchemaConverter.java:
##########
@@ -99,9 +139,9 @@ private Type.Repetition getRepetition(FieldDescriptor 
descriptor) {
     }
   }
 
-  private <T> Builder<? extends Builder<?, GroupBuilder<T>>, GroupBuilder<T>> 
addField(FieldDescriptor descriptor, final GroupBuilder<T> builder) {
+  private <T> Builder<? extends Builder<?, GroupBuilder<T>>, GroupBuilder<T>> 
addField(FieldDescriptor descriptor, final GroupBuilder<T> builder, 
ImmutableSetMultimap<String, Integer> seen, int depth) {

Review Comment:
   i'm not sure encapsulation helps with readability or protection in this 
case.  they are really tracking different things, and should be understood by 
readers of the traversal code to know how each piece of state is used.





> [parquet-protobuf] stack overflow when work with well known json type
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PARQUET-1711
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1711
>             Project: Parquet
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.10.1
>            Reporter: Lawrence He
>            Priority: Major
>
> Writing following protobuf message as parquet file is not possible: 
> {code:java}
> syntax = "proto3";
> import "google/protobuf/struct.proto";
> package test;
> option java_outer_classname = "CustomMessage";
> message TestMessage {
>     map<string, google.protobuf.ListValue> data = 1;
> } {code}
> Protobuf introduced "well known json type" such like 
> [ListValue|https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/google.protobuf#listvalue]
>  to work around json schema conversion. 
> However writing above messages traps parquet writer into an infinite loop due 
> to the "general type" support in protobuf. Current implementation will keep 
> referencing 6 possible types defined in protobuf (null, bool, number, string, 
> struct, list) and entering infinite loop when referencing "struct".
> {code:java}
> java.lang.StackOverflowErrorjava.lang.StackOverflowError at 
> java.base/java.util.Arrays$ArrayItr.<init>(Arrays.java:4418) at 
> java.base/java.util.Arrays$ArrayList.iterator(Arrays.java:4410) at 
> java.base/java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection$1.<init>(Collections.java:1044)
>  at 
> java.base/java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection.iterator(Collections.java:1043)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.convertFields(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:64)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.addField(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:96)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.convertFields(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:66)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.addField(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:96)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.convertFields(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:66)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.addField(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:96)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.convertFields(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:66)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.addField(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:96)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.convertFields(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:66)
>  at 
> org.apache.parquet.proto.ProtoSchemaConverter.addField(ProtoSchemaConverter.java:96)
>  {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to