[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17656517#comment-17656517
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PARQUET-2212:
-----------------------------------------

wgtmac commented on PR #1008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/1008#issuecomment-1376928785

   > @wgtmac Do you have time to have a look?
   
   @shangxinli Thanks for mentioning me. Sure, I will take a look this week.




> Add ByteBuffer api for decryptors to allow direct memory to be decrypted
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PARQUET-2212
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2212
>             Project: Parquet
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: parquet-mr
>    Affects Versions: 1.12.3
>            Reporter: Parth Chandra
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.12.3
>
>
> The decrypt API in BlockCipher.Decryptor currently only provides an api that 
> takes in a byte array
> {code:java}
> byte[] decrypt(byte[] lengthAndCiphertext, byte[] AAD);{code}
> A parquet reader that uses the DirectByteBufferAllocator has to incur the 
> cost of copying the data into a byte array (and sometimes back to a 
> DirectByteBuffer) to decrypt data.
> This proposes adding a new API that accepts ByteBuffer as input and avoids 
> the data copy.
> {code:java}
> ByteBuffer decrypt(ByteBuffer from, byte[] AAD);{code}
> The decryption in ColumnChunkPageReadStore can also be updated to use the 
> ByteBuffer based api if the buffer is a DirectByteBuffer. If the buffer is a 
> HeapByteBuffer, then we can continue to use the byte array API since that 
> does not incur a copy when the underlying byte array is accessed.
> Also, some investigation has shown that decryption with ByteBuffers is not 
> able to use hardware acceleration in JVM's before JDK17. In those cases, the 
> overall decryption speed is faster with byte arrays even after incurring the 
> overhead of making a copy. 
> The proposal, then, is to enable the use of the ByteBuffer api for 
> DirectByteBuffers only, and only if the JDK is JDK17 or higher or the user 
> explicitly configures it. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to