I think we can wait for a complete PoC implementation of PARQUET-2261 before release. BTW, I'd like to see the implementation from Micah to fully understand the use case. If he is too busy to do that, I can do it based on my understanding.
Best, Gang On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 4:34 PM Gábor Szádovszky <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks a lot for volunteering, Gang! > > However it is more than 2 years indeed since the last release I think the > actual changes since then are more important. There are lots of > additions/corrections in the spec docs and the thrift file comments which > are very important but not tightly attached to a format release. I only can > see PARQUET-2257 that contains an actual change in the thrift structure. > > Related to the ongoing effort of PARQUET-2261: I think, we are waiting for > a PoC implementation. @emkornfield: Do you plan to work on this? > > The question is if we think PARQUET-2257 is urgent enough to not to wait > for PARQUET-2261 and have an additional release after the latter is ready > or we shall wait for the PoC implementation and release format after it. > > On 2023/05/02 03:33:05 Gang Wu wrote: > > Thanks Fokko! > > > > Let us just wait for more inputs to see if it is good to proceed. > > > > Best, > > Gang > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 4:05 PM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hey Gang, > > > > > > Great bringing this up, I think that would be a great idea! > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Fokko > > > > > > Op do 27 apr 2023 om 09:52 schreef Gang Wu <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > The latest parquet format is v2.9.0 [1] which was released two years > ago. > > > > Is it a good time to release the next version? If there is no > objection, > > > I > > > > can > > > > volunteer to be the release manager. > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/master/CHANGES.md > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Gang > > > > > > > > > >
