[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17774961#comment-17774961
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PARQUET-2347:
-----------------------------------------
amousavigourabi commented on code in PR #1141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/1141#discussion_r1358424942
##########
parquet-hadoop/src/main/java/org/apache/parquet/ParquetReadOptions.java:
##########
@@ -185,6 +232,31 @@ public static class Builder {
protected int maxAllocationSize = ALLOCATION_SIZE_DEFAULT;
protected Map<String, String> properties = new HashMap<>();
protected FileDecryptionProperties fileDecryptionProperties = null;
+ protected ParquetConfiguration conf;
+
+ public Builder() {
Review Comment:
As this is public, removing the implicit no-args constructor _could_
potentially cause problems for users.
> Add interface layer between Parquet and Hadoop Configuration
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PARQUET-2347
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2347
> Project: Parquet
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: parquet-mr
> Reporter: Atour Mousavi Gourabi
> Priority: Minor
>
> Parquet relies heavily on a few Hadoop classes, such as its Configuration
> class, which is used throughout Parquet's reading and writing logic. If we
> include our own interface for this, this could potentially allow users to use
> Parquet's readers and writers without the Hadoop dependency later on.
> In order to preserve backward compatibility and avoid breaking downstream
> projects, the constructors and methods using Hadoop's constructor should be
> preserved for the time being, though I would favour deprecation in the near
> future.
> This is part of an effort that has been [discussed on the dev mailing
> list|https://lists.apache.org/thread/4wl0l3d9dkpx4w69jx3rwnjk034dtqr8].
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
