Just a heads-up that I've created a PR [1] to update the matrix for parquet-cpp and parquet-java. Let me know if you have any suggestion. Thanks!
[1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/100 On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 10:11 PM Andrew Lamb <andrewlam...@gmail.com> wrote: > I wanted to highlight that there is a PR[1] to fill out this matrix for > cuda . Super exciting to see this starting > > [1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/99# > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 2:57 PM Andrew Lamb <andrewlam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you! A small step perhaps but a major step forward > > > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 1:03 PM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> I just merged it. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Micah > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 2:32 AM Andrew Lamb <andrewlam...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > The initial feature matrix PR[1], has all outstanding comments > addressed > >> > and is ready to merge from my opinion. > >> > > >> > Could one of the committers consider merging it so we can start > filling > >> the > >> > matrix out? > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Andrew > >> > > >> > [1]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/34 > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 11:22 AM Andrew Lamb <andrewlam...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > I filed a ticket [1] to discuss integration testing / feature > >> > > compatibility testing > >> > > > >> > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/issues/441 > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:03 AM Andrew Lamb < > andrewlam...@gmail.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> I will file a ticket for discussion shortly > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024, 06:55 Julien Le Dem <jul...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> I agree with Antoine for the separate thread/ticket for > integration > >> > >>> testing > >> > >>> > >> > >>> For the « implementation status » PR, I agree we can merge and > >> > iterate. I > >> > >>> added a couple of comments that can easily be addressed > afterwards. > >> > >>> Julien > >> > >>> > >> > >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:43 Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> > >> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > IMHO, we should either start a dedicated discussion thread for > >> > >>> > integration testing, or open a GH issue and discuss it there. > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > Regards > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > Antoine. > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:21:33 +0200 > >> > >>> > Alkis Evlogimenos > >> > >>> > <alkis.evlogime...@databricks.com.INVALID> > >> > >>> > wrote: > >> > >>> > > It would be nice if the integration suite specifies how a > driver > >> > can > >> > >>> be > >> > >>> > > executed. Then each implementation can provide a driver and > the > >> > suite > >> > >>> > will > >> > >>> > > use that for validation. > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > By specifying both reads and writes for the driver we get a > lot > >> > more > >> > >>> > power. > >> > >>> > > Given an input we can roundtrip all combination of > >> readers/writers > >> > >>> and > >> > >>> > > verify they can roundtrip. > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 6:42 PM Andrew Lamb < > >> > >>> > andrewlamb11-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > FWIW I started hacking up a prototype[1] of what a > >> > parquet-testing > >> > >>> > > > integration suite might look like if anyone is interested > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/5956 > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 10:39 AM Alkis Evlogimenos > >> > >>> > > > <alkis.evlogime...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote: > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > +1. > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > I would suggest you address the comments first? I went > >> through > >> > >>> the > >> > >>> > open > >> > >>> > > > > ones and most of them make sense to me (and left few > >> additional > >> > >>> > > > comments). > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:42 PM Andrew Lamb < > >> > >>> andrewlam...@gmail.com > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > > wrote: > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > Thank you > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:40 PM Micah Kornfield < > >> > >>> > > > emkornfi...@gmail.com> > >> > >>> > > > > > wrote: > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > Hi Andrew, > >> > >>> > > > > > > I agree with this sentiment, I asked on the PR if > there > >> > would > >> > >>> > be > >> > >>> > > > > another > >> > >>> > > > > > > pass and then I can merge it. > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > Cheers, > >> > >>> > > > > > > Micah > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 3:20 AM Andrew Lamb < > >> > >>> > andrewlam...@gmail.com> > >> > >>> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > Hello Parquet Devs, > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > I propose we merge the first (admittedly bare bones) > >> > >>> > > > "Implementation > >> > >>> > > > > > > > Status" page PR [1] to the website soon. I think > this > >> > page > >> > >>> is > >> > >>> > vital > >> > >>> > > > > to > >> > >>> > > > > > > the > >> > >>> > > > > > > > Parquet community (and to any attempt to extend the > >> > >>> format) so > >> > >>> > the > >> > >>> > > > > > sooner > >> > >>> > > > > > > > the better. > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > The reason to merge the PR now is to have a base > from > >> > which > >> > >>> > to > >> > >>> > > > build. > >> > >>> > > > > > > That > >> > >>> > > > > > > > PR is already over a year old and has so many > >> comments it > >> > >>> is > >> > >>> > hard > >> > >>> > > > to > >> > >>> > > > > > > follow > >> > >>> > > > > > > > or know what the path forward is. If we insist on > >> sorting > >> > >>> all > >> > >>> > the > >> > >>> > > > > > details > >> > >>> > > > > > > > out before we merge it I fear it will never merge. > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > Once we have a page, I think the next steps are to > >> add a > >> > >>> > preamble > >> > >>> > > > > > > > explaining what it is for and to start trying to > fill > >> out > >> > >>> the > >> > >>> > chart > >> > >>> > > > > for > >> > >>> > > > > > > an > >> > >>> > > > > > > > implementation (I am happy to try for parquet-rs). I > >> > >>> suspect > >> > >>> > during > >> > >>> > > > > > that > >> > >>> > > > > > > > process we will have to adjust some of the charts > >> more. > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > Thank you for your consideration (and thank you for > >> all > >> > the > >> > >>> > > > comments > >> > >>> > > > > so > >> > >>> > > > > > > > far) > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > Andrew > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/34 > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >
