Hey Eugene, Gang, Thanks for bringing this up.
Should we create an issue targeting milestone 2.0 <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/milestone/27>? We've taken the first steps to drop Java 8, like Hadoop 2.x. I think with the new types like Variant and Geo coming up, I think it is reasonable to make sure that we also release these features to the audience that's still on Java 8. Kind regards, Fokko Op wo 19 mrt 2025 om 02:28 schreef Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com>: > Thanks for bringing this up! > > I think this requires a major version bump which has been discussed at [1]. > According to our release cadence [2], should we plan a parquet-java 2.0.0 > release with action items like dropping Java 8 support? > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kttwbl5l7opz6nwb5bck2gghc2y3td0o > [2] > > https://parquet.apache.org/docs/contribution-guidelines/releasing/#release-cadence > > Best, > Gang > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 8:03 AM Eugene Shvartsman <code...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Our team is looking for a resolution on > > https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/1308 > > > > The issue with the build appears to be that parquet-java is build on Java > > 8 while the new protobuf library is built on Java 11. `wgtmac` mentioned > > that I should reach out to this dev group for a wider audience. > > > > Are there any plans in motion to upgrade to Java 11? > > > > Thank you, > > Eugene Shvartsman > > > > >
