Hi team,

Just wanted to resurface the doc in your email folders, looking forward to
some suggestions.
I'll work towards adding a few more datasets to the comparison in the
coming days.

Best
Prateek

On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 9:01 AM PRATEEK GAUR <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Antoine,
>
> Apologies for the delay. Got some time to work on it and updated the doc
> with the requested numbers.
>
>    - Obtained the numbers for ZSTD again. I agree they were incorrect.
>    - Fixed the algorithm to use decompressed size/data
>    - Added BSS + ZSTD to the evaluation metrics
>    - Added BSS + Lz4 to the evaluation metrics
>
>
> Updated doc :
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZZOtxmq6K8pNU0npijfSglTJVkspXL5GLDKPSGj9HlA/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.uzgoevv9ajp
> Will be pushing the branch/code for the same today.
>
> Best
> Prateek
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 11:30 AM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I looked at the doc and the stated decompression speeds for ZSTD look
>> highly irrealistic.
>>
>> I think what happens is that you are computing decompression speed as:
>>
>>    size of compressed data / time to decompress
>>
>> while you should really compute it as:
>>
>>    size of uncompressed data / time to decompress
>>
>> Otherwise you're simply making ZSTD look miserable because it compresses
>> so well.
>>
>> Also, I think you should also add BYTE_STREAM_SPLIT + ZSTD into the mix
>> (and possible BYTE_STREAM_SPLIT + LZ4 if you're going to evaluate LZ4).
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Antoine.
>>
>>
>> Le 06/12/2025 à 23:24, PRATEEK GAUR a écrit :
>> > Hi team,
>> >
>> > We wanted to share performance numbers for one of the candidate
>> encodings
>> > we have been discussing for parquet, for numeric compression.
>> >
>> > Following doc, PFOR : Encoding
>> > <
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZZOtxmq6K8pNU0npijfSglTJVkspXL5GLDKPSGj9HlA/edit?tab=t.0
>> >,
>> > talks through numbers on compression speed, compression ratio and
>> > decompression speed for columns values from the clickbench data. Based
>> on
>> > the numbers PFOR gives superior decompression speed compared to
>> > DELTABITPACK and RLEBITPACKHYBRID and fares better on average in
>> > compression ratio. Comparison has also been made with ZSTD compression
>> in
>> > the above doc.
>> >
>> > We plan to expand to a few more datasets and work on a prototype in
>> arrow
>> > cpp code in early Jan.
>> > Looking forward to the feedback from the group.
>> >
>> > Best
>> > Prateek
>> >
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to