The biggest thing would be to ask [email protected]. I would err on the
side of including the  - Hadoop under the current guidelines should
have it IMO, but .. YMMV

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: [email protected]
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Aniszczyk <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 2:43 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Apache Parquet Logo Followup and Vote

>Yep, not sure how much of a hard requirement it is given logos like hadoop
>don't have that symbol: http://hadoop.apache.org/
>
>It's fairly trivial to add ourselves if we need to so lets just assume
>that
>will be done if required.
>
>On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Tom White <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> BTW I just noticed this document:
>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics, which says
>> that project logos should have a "TM" on them.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The votes and comments are in (we had 16 votes):
>>>
>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>
>>> The first logo one won overall. I've attached copies of the winning
>>>logo.
>>>
>>> However, before we finalize things, can I have the Apache Parquet
>>> committers vote +1 or -1 on this if they are comfortable with
>>>finalizing
>>> the logo (lets give it 24 hours do it via lazy consensus).
>>>
>>> Implicit +1 from me.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Chris Aniszczyk
>>> http://aniszczyk.org
>>> +1 512 961 6719
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Cheers,
>
>Chris Aniszczyk
>http://aniszczyk.org
>+1 512 961 6719

Reply via email to