Thanks for making this change. The old ant build was not obvious, especially with respect to dependencies.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Martinez, Mel - 1004 - MITLL < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Yes, please support the Ant build for awhile. My environment presents some > challenges to overcome in order to use Maven. I *want* to use Maven, but > there are simply some issues to resolve here. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jukka Zitting (JIRA) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 8:21 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [jira] Resolved: (PDFBOX-545) Switch PDFBox build to Maven > > > [ > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel] > > Jukka Zitting resolved PDFBOX-545. > ---------------------------------- > > Resolution: Fixed > > This is now pretty much done, as the Maven build does most of what the Ant > build does and also some things that the Ant build does not do. > > For now it seems like the best approach is to leave the Ant build there for > backwards compatibility and for things like the IKVM builds. We can phase > out > the Ant build over the 1.x release cycle as people become more familiar > with > the Maven build. > > > Switch PDFBox build to Maven > > ---------------------------- > > > > Key: PDFBOX-545 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-545 > > Project: PDFBox > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Reporter: Jukka Zitting > > Assignee: Jukka Zitting > > Fix For: 1.0.0 > > > > > > As discussed on the mailing list, I'm planning to switch the PDFBox build > to > > use Maven instead of Ant. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve
