+1 on the release.

re: the .Net binaries, I have them built ... and strong named / signed in
the .Net fashion.  Mixing PGP signing w/ signing for inclusion in the GAC is
not, as far as I can tell, supported.  Application of the 2nd signature
invalidates the first.  For .Net assemblies strong naming is, in my opinion,
more suitable than a PGP signature.

The binaries are at
http://www.blacklocustsoftware.com/Downloads/PDFBox_100_RC_Net_Binaries.zip...
and I can place them somewhere on Apache if you tell me where.  Or
more
likely, you'll just want to grab them & incorporate them into the release.

Daniel

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Martinez, Mel - 1004 - MITLL <
[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> I mostly tested text extraction.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:13 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [VOTE] Release FontBox 1.0.0 and PDFBox 1.0.0
>
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared candidates for the FontBox 1.0.0 and PDFBox 1.0.0
> releases. They're available for review at:
>
>    
> http://people.apache.org/~jukka/pdfbox/1.0.0/fontbox/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejukka/pdfbox/1.0.0/fontbox/>
>    
> http://people.apache.org/~jukka/pdfbox/1.0.0/pdfbox/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejukka/pdfbox/1.0.0/pdfbox/>
>
> The release candidates are zip archives of the sources in:
>
>    http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/fontbox/tags/1.0.0/
>    http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/1.0.0/
>
> The SHA1 checksums of the candidate archives are:
>
>    fd97306798dd9994e79ab52fba699ea79acd02b4 fontbox-1.0.0-src.zip
>    d3bf10510e972b2720bcc2e6fd2e6d75cb0eebfb pdfbox-1.0.0-src.zip
>
> A staged Maven repository containing the binary release artifacts is
> available at:
>
>    
> http://people.apache.org/~jukka/pdfbox/1.0.0/repo/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejukka/pdfbox/1.0.0/repo/>
>
> I haven't included .NET binaries since I don't have the required
> tooling to do that. Daniel, if you can build the binaries and make
> them available with your PGP signatures, then I can include them in
> the release.
>
> Note that you will need to build and install the FontBox 1.0.0 release
> first before building PDFBox 1.0.0 to satisfy the dependency between
> the projects.
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages. The vote is open for the next
> 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 PDFBox PMC
> votes are cast.
>
>   [ ] +1 Release these package as FontBox 1.0.0 and PDFBox 1.0.0
>   [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Jukka Zitting
>

Reply via email to