Hi,
Am 03.03.2013 18:33, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
I guess everybody agrees on the fact that a new PDFBox release is overdue!
There are a lot of improvements and bugfixes in our queue waiting to be
released.
I'm planing to act as release manager and cut a new release based on the
current trunk in round about 2 weeks from now.
Thanks, this is greatly appreciated.
I'd like to include preflight and xmpbox into this release, but there are
some questions we should discuss before.
1.)
How should we provide the "new" parts? As jar similar to the other
parts, but
what about the validate-application? Should we move it to the pdfbox-app or
should we create a preflight-app which could be used as standalone jar?
I would vote for releasing it as a separate jar because the usage
scenarios are different.
2.)
Eric remove the padaf packname from preflight. What about xmpbox, should we
remove the padaf packagename as well?
Yes, I would think so.
3.)
preflight/xmpbox and pdfbox are using different formatting rules (tab vs.
spaces, brace positions etc). Should we just use the checkstyle rules or
should we first discuss on how to format our codebase based on the existing
checkstyle rules?
I wouldn't mind using the existing checkstyle rules.
Best regards,
Timo
--
Timo Boehme
OntoChem GmbH
H.-Damerow-Str. 4
06120 Halle/Saale
T: +49 345 4780474
F: +49 345 4780471
[email protected]
_____________________________________________________________________
OntoChem GmbH
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Lutz Weber
Sitz: Halle / Saale
Registergericht: Stendal
Registernummer: HRB 215461
_____________________________________________________________________
