Hi Andreas, sound like you are having a very enjoyable time.
+1 for the proposal Maruan Sahyoun Am 26.04.2013 um 07:36 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler <andr...@lehmi.de>: > Hi, > > sorry for answering that late but my time is limited at present due to > an ongoing family event. :-) > > There were more or less different opinions about the future layout of > our svn repo, but I guess there is a way everybody could agree to. > > What do you think about the following proposal: > > - use the current trunk for the ongoing development of 2.0.0 > - use indivual branches for bigger changes in the trunk, as Guillaume > did when refactoring xmpbox > - use the current 1.8-branch [1] for bugfix-releases, as I did when > releasing 1.8.1 > - a possible 1.9-branch could be created using the 1.8-branch if > necessary > > Is this something everybody can agree to? > > BR > Andreas Lehmkühler > > [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pdfbox/branches/1.8/ > > > Am 18.04.13 21:11, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >> Hi, >> >> what is our next target after releasing 1.8.0 and 1.8.1? >> >> We already started some discussions about that topic, but I'd like to have >> clarification. Is it time to go for a 2.0 version? If we agree to that >> goal, >> how should we proceed? Should we branch or simply use the trunk? >> >> I'd prefer to continue using the trunk. We are still able to release >> bugfix versions using the 1.8-branch. Even a new 1.9 feature release >> should be possible by branching the 1.8-branch. >> >> WDYT? >> >> BR >> Andreas Lehmkühler > >
