[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13721174#comment-13721174
 ] 

Kirk Haines edited comment on PDFBOX-1511 at 7/31/13 6:48 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

I have also experienced this (Windows 7, Java 1.6.0_35-b10 64-bit) in PDFBox 
1.7.1 thru the current trunk.  I tried Maruan's suggestion and it resolved the 
issue, at the expense of creating unnecessary duplicate resources.  I had 
noticed that the corruption in subsequent documents resulted in those pages 
having their formatting preserved, but the text content had many letters 
substituted (all 'd' replaced by 'f', all 'y' replaced by 'd', etc.)  I also 
found that the degree of corruption depended on how similar the beginning text 
content of each input document was.  When there was a common header in the 
documents being merged, there were only a few substitutions.  When it was 
merging a document with itself, there were no errors.  When the document header 
was very different, the resulting text was undecipherable garbage.  This made 
me suspect that it may be a problem with a compression dictionary, using the 
dictionary from the first file on subsequent files.  At first I thought this 
dictionary was in the flate compression being applied to the stream, but found 
that it was in the CMap of a font resource.  Both documents used the same name 
for the font, so the PDFMerger only retained the copy from the first PDF in the 
merged PDF.  When subsequent pages from subsequent input documents referenced 
the font, they used the CMap dictionary from the first input document, 
resulting in various degrees of garbled text.  Lesson learned, Font resources 
may have content that is dependent on the strings they were used to display.
                
      was (Author: kirk.haines):
    I have also experienced this (Windows 7, Java 1.6.0_35-b10 64-bit) in 
PDFBox 1.7.1 thru the current trunk.  I tried Maruan's suggestion and it 
resolved the issue, at the expense of creating unnecessary duplicate resources. 
 I had noticed that the corruption in subsequent documents resulted in those 
pages having their formatting preserved, but the text content had many letters 
substituted (all 'd' replaced by 'f', all 'y' replaced by 'd', etc.)  I also 
found that the degree of corruption depended on how similar the beginning text 
content of each input document was.  When there was a common header in the 
documents being merged, there were only a few substitutions.  When it was 
merging a document with itself, there were no errors.  When the document header 
was very different, the resulting text was undecipherable garbage.  This made 
me suspect that it may be a problem with the deflate compression being applied 
to the stream.  I thought that it might be using the (compression) dictionary 
from the first document and copying the physical bytes from the source document 
rather than the reading the logical bytes and allowing the deflate filter in 
the context of the destination document to re-encode them.
                  
> pdfMerger App produces Garbage
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PDFBOX-1511
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1511
>             Project: PDFBox
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Utilities
>    Affects Versions: 1.7.1
>         Environment: Win XP; Windows Server 2008 R2; java version "1.6.0_21", 
>            Reporter: Michael Huber
>         Attachments: 1.pdf, 2.pdf, PdfRenderer.java, targetPdfMergeJava.pdf, 
> targetPdfMergeUtilityApp.pdf
>
>
> pdfbox Utility pdfMerger produces a merged document containing garbage. All 
> merged pdf files are contained but Strings are destroyed.
> The source pdf files are created with graphviz and are readable without error 
> or disturbance both with Acrobat X and pdfbox pdfDebug Utility.
> Another astoundig thing is that a handcoded merger using pdfMergerUtility 
> class works fine when run within Eclipse Juno and creates same garbage when 
> run from cmd line (pls. see attached source)
> I checked everything that comes in mind to find the differences, e.g. Java 
> version, encoding/codepage issues, memory settings, found nothing.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to