[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13947753#comment-13947753
]
Thomas Chojecki commented on PDFBOX-2001:
-----------------------------------------
There is a problem parsing the field dictionary. It should contain two entries
but if I get the first entry, I will get the field dictionary object. It is
some kind of parsing problem.
The document catalog looks really weird, it contains only direct objects up to
the felds. Also it has a second signature encapsulate inside the perms
dictionary.
> Digital Signature information
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: PDFBOX-2001
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2001
> Project: PDFBox
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.8.3
> Reporter: Nicolas Kaczmarski
> Attachments: D.1_signiert.pdf
>
>
> We have a signed PDF but signature is described without key "Sig".
> As you can see in the standard PDF 32000-1:2008 - Table 252 - Entries in a
> signature dictionary, this key is optional :
> "(Optional) The type of PDF object that this dictionary describes; if
> present, shall be Sig for a signature dictionary. "
> But PDFBox seems to limit its research of signature only if this key "Sig" is
> present.
> What is your position about that?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
