[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13960337#comment-13960337
]
Tilman Hausherr commented on PDFBOX-2007:
-----------------------------------------
I didn't claim that DCTDecode is called. I said that "/DCTDecode" images are
being handled by JPXFilter in 1.8. See the discussion in PDFBOX-52 near the
end, this was the same misunderstanding. And see this code in 1.8:
{code}
addFilter( COSName.DCT_DECODE, jpxFilter);
addFilter( COSName.DCT_DECODE_ABBREVIATION, jpxFilter);
{code}
> Performance regression since PDFRenderer
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: PDFBOX-2007
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2007
> Project: PDFBox
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Rendering
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: François Bernier
> Labels: perfomance, regression
> Attachments: PDFBOX-2007.pdf
>
>
> Hi,
> I have the following toy project where I use PDFBox:
> https://github.com/fbernier/taz-clj
> I've been using the snapshot versions of PDFBox for quite a while and
> recently since the move from RenderUtil#convertToImage to
> PDFRenderer#renderImage (this commit:
> https://github.com/fbernier/taz-clj/commit/47917d494f2a9a0999da7f36827c45145d4bb42c),
> there is quite a big performance regression. If I change the PDFBox
> dependency to 1.8.x, everything is good. Here are my benchmarks:
> PDFBox 1.8.x:
> Running 1m test @ http://127.0.0.1:8080/testing.pdf?page=1
> 4 threads and 4 connections
> Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
> Latency 208.98ms 58.27ms 391.43ms 52.08%
> Req/Sec 4.63 1.73 8.00 62.88%
> 1224 requests in 1.00m, 72.34MB read
> Requests/sec: 20.40
> Transfer/sec: 1.21MB
> PDFBox 2.0.0:
> Running 1m test @ http://127.0.0.1:8080/testing.pdf?page=1
> 4 threads and 4 connections
> Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
> Latency 920.25ms 378.94ms 2.76s 91.38%
> Req/Sec 0.80 0.40 1.00 80.17%
> 275 requests in 1.00m, 15.85MB read
> Requests/sec: 4.58
> Transfer/sec: 270.41KB
> I have not looked any further than this and have no more data to give you
> (yet).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
