[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14066787#comment-14066787
 ] 

Tilman Hausherr commented on PDFBOX-2225:
-----------------------------------------

This is indeed a weird piece of code. Would this make more sense?
{code}
        catch (Exception e)
        {
            // if we are not ignoring exceptions, we'll re-throw this
            if (!ignoreAcroFormErrors && e instanceof IOException)
            {
                throw new IOException(e);
            }
        }
{code}
This is what the author intended, although it isn't helpful either, as it would 
swallow all language related exceptions, e.g. the mentioned 
IndexOutOfBoundsException.

> ClassCastException in PDFMergerUtility.appendDocument
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PDFBOX-2225
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2225
>             Project: PDFBox
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Utilities
>    Affects Versions: 1.8.6
>         Environment: Windows 7 64-bit, JDK8, pdfbox 1.8.1 or 1.8.6
>            Reporter: Brandon Lyon
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Edit: Problem confirmed to exist in 1.8.1 and 1.8.6
> The following exception will occur if any type of Exception other than 
> IOException is thrown within a particular try-catch in 
> PDFMergerUtility.appendDocument:
> java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException cannot be 
> cast to java.io.IOException
> For the version I am using (1.8.1), the problem occurs on line 294
> The problem is that the author mistakenly assumed that the only exception 
> which could be caught was IOException. I recommend that the cast be removed, 
> and that either the additional checked exceptions be thrown by appendDocument 
> or wrapped with an unchecked exception
> Also, anyone seeing this may want to investigate why an 
> IndexOutOfBoundsException is occurring here, though this is obviously a 
> separate issue



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to