[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14175577#comment-14175577
]
Maruan Sahyoun commented on PDFBOX-1386:
----------------------------------------
Could you elaborate a little what’s missing in the current implementation and
which uses cases can’t be addressed (OCGs are not an area I’m using). Also I
see that e.g. DTPDOptionalContentGroup extends PDOptionalContentGroup. Couldn’t
that be handled by providing a patch to PDOptionalContentGroup?
> Proposal for classes to handle optional contents
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PDFBOX-1386
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1386
> Project: PDFBox
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: PDModel
> Reporter: Dominic Tubach
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: DTCOSName.java, DTPDContentUsageDictionary.java,
> DTPDContentUsageDictionaryTest.java, DTPDOptionalContentConfiguration.java,
> DTPDOptionalContentConfigurationTest.java, DTPDOptionalContentGroup.java,
> DTPDOptionalContentGroupTest.java,
> DTPDOptionalContentMembershipDictionary.java,
> DTPDOptionalContentMembershipDictionaryTest.java,
> DTPDOptionalContentProperties.java, DTPDOptionalContentPropertiesTest.java,
> DTPDUsageApplicationDictionary.java, DTPDUsageApplicationDictionaryTest.java
>
>
> Attached are classes as proposal to handle optional contents.
> It requires the classes in the issues #PDFBOX-1383 and #PDFBOX-1385
> It requires Java 1.6 (It might be enough to remove the @Override annotations
> for Java 1.5 compatibility.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
