To be fair, the resolution of that issue was that we introduced a new interface to FontBox, which made it easier to port code from 1.8.
-- John > On 13 Nov 2014, at 05:43, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > The API wasn't restored but I worked around it in my code. > > Thanks > > -----Original Message----- > From: Maruan Sahyoun [mailto:sahy...@fileaffairs.de] > Sent: 13 November 2014 13:19 > To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org > Subject: Re: pdfbox 2 > > Hi Simon, > > according to the ticket the issues are resolved. Is that correct? > > BR > Maruan > >> Am 13.11.2014 um 13:14 schrieb Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>: >> >> Hi, >> >> I listed some here: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2360 >> >> I don't expect listing more would make any difference to pdfbox >> refactoring work. >> >> Thanks >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Maruan Sahyoun [mailto:sahy...@fileaffairs.de] >> Sent: 13 November 2014 11:32 >> To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org >> Subject: Re: pdfbox 2 >> >> Hi Simon, >> >> it would be good to understand which API calls you are using so to try >> to make sure that we don't break these as we move forward finishing PDFBox > 2. >> >> BR >> >> Maruan >> >>> Am 13.11.2014 um 12:22 schrieb Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> Apache Fop project needs to make a release in next few weeks. >>> >>> We currently include pdfbox 2 snapshot jars since we can't rely on >>> awt parsing fonts in 1.8 as this doesn't work under Java 7, pdfbox 2 >>> fixed this by writing its own font parsers. >>> >>> Also we make use of font parsers added in 2.0 and many other bugs fixed. >>> >>> >>> >>> Can Fop project make a release including PDFBox 2.0 snapshot jars in >>> our release? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks > >
