This isn’t a good situation at all, we had a usable documentation system in October and now we have nothing usable, with almost no content and no way to easily contribute.
We’d agreed that moving to docs to GitHub was an experiment to see if it made contributing easier but it’s had the opposite effect, we’re in a less usable state than ever. It seems like we’d be better off going back to our working SVN documentation and creating a new 2.0 branch from the 1.8 docs and then updating them. We just haven’t realised the benefit from doing things differently. -- John > On 1 Jan 2015, at 12:52, Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> wrote: > > the docs shall reside in pdfbox-docs from where they will be pulled onto the > website or looked at directly at github. > > The publishing process to our website is not yet in place as there is no new > content. I'm looking to get the redesign of the website done to accommodate > for the old 1.8 and new 2.0 release. > > Maruan > > Am 01.01.2015 um 19:38 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: > >> Hi All, >> >> We’re getting closer to 2.0 being ready and I’m thinking about writing some >> docs, but currently the situation seems to be worse than it was before the >> docs stated moving to GitHub - where are our canonical docs and how can I >> contribute to them? >> >> All I see on GitHub is some old 1.8 stuff and an incomplete cookbook for >> forms. Is this content live anywhere? Is there a pay to preview it? >> >> -- John >> >
