[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14270720#comment-14270720
]
Maruan Sahyoun commented on PDFBOX-2592:
----------------------------------------
Now as we have sorted why the nullifying is in there:
If we are *100% sure* that the changes to COSDocument - i.e. only leave
{code}
((COSStream)cosObject).close();
{code}
in there to address closing the stream have no negative side effect I’d propose
that we move ahead with the change as this will make a number of workflows
(especially merging documents) much easier.
If there is believe that it *might* have a negative side effect I’d propose
that we move it out to 2.1 to not get additional regressions in 2.0 as the
proposed change wouldn’t affect the API so doesn’t have to be done in a major
release.
In addition I do propose that PDDocument.importPage shall be changed to do a
deep cloning of a page so *even if the original objects have been cleared* it
will work. The current code is somewhere in between addPage and deep cloning so
as it stands today not very useful. This for 2.1
WDYT?
> Allow sharing of COS objects between different documents
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PDFBOX-2592
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2592
> Project: PDFBox
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: PDModel
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: John Hewson
> Assignee: John Hewson
>
> A number of users on the mailing list have asked about how to import pages
> from other PDFs as forms, our current solution is LayerUtility, which is
> depends on PDFCloneUtility. Both these classes are surprisingly complex for
> what should be a simple task.
> The two main tasks which these classes perform is copying the page's
> COSStream and cloning every relevant COS object. However, there seems to be
> no real need to do any of this copying and cloning - there's nothing about
> any of the COS objects which is specific to a given document. While a
> COSStream can share the same backing file as the COSDocument, this isn't a
> problem for COSWriter, even then we need only make sure that an exception is
> thrown if a COSStream is used after its parent COSDocument is closed.
> Note that there *is* one artificial dependency between COSDictionary and
> COSArrays and their parent COSDocument, that is that calling close() on the
> COSDocument clears the contents of all child COSDictionary and COSArrays.
> However, there's no need for this, it seems to have come about due to some
> long past confusion regarding how garbage collection works in Java - we all
> know that it's not necessary to set objects to null or clear lists when we
> are done with them.
> I propose that we get rid of the unnecessary object and list clearing in
> COSDocument#close() and add some checks to COSStream to throw user-friendly
> exceptions when reading from a closed backing stream. This will allow us to
> directly share COS objects between different COSDocuments, allowing simple "x
> = y" copying and making LayerUtility and PDFCloneUtility unnecessary. Instead
> of:
> {code}
> COSStream pageStream = (COSStream)page.getStream().getCOSObject();
> PDStream newStream = new PDStream(targetDoc,
> pageStream.getUnfilteredStream(), false);
> PDFormXObject form = new PDFormXObject(newStream);
> PDResources pageRes = page.getResources();
> PDResources formRes = new PDResources();
> PDFCloneUtility cloner = new PDFCloneUtility(document);
> cloner.cloneMerge(pageRes, formRes);
> form.setResources(formRes);
> {code}
> We could have:
> {code}
> PDFormXObject form = new PDFormXObject(page.getStream());
> form.setResources(page.getResources());
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
