Am 07.03.2015 um 23:48 schrieb Daniel Wilson:
So if I were to try to get Maven to build for IKVM, would you see some value in that?
That would be the best solution.
BR Andreas Lehmkühler
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:53 PM, John Hewson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On 6 Mar 2015, at 00:16, Andreas Lehmkühler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi, > >> Daniel Wilson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> hat am 5. März 2015 um 23:16 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Yes, it is needed for IKVM. But I was just informed that the IKVM build is >> considered an unsupported 3rd-party version. > As Tilman already said, there wasn't any descision to stop supporting it, but as > none of the active committers uses .NET there wasn't any real support for it. > Additionally we never shipped any official .NET binary. > > There was a proposal to include the IKVM build in maven but I'm still waiting > for some answers and I didn't find some time to test it myself. At the moment the Ant build system seems to be a band aid preventing anyone from bothering to figure out how to use Maven for IKVM. Let’s remove that, because our inadequate Ant build is now causing problems from Java developers, as evidenced on the mailing list. — John >> As far as I can tell, it is also needed for the TestPDFToImage junit test. >> That is the testimage target in the ant build. >> >> Btw, I DID get the ant build to produce a working version of PDFBox >> yesterday. I simply needed to download the appropriate binaries from the >> maven repo. > We still have a jenkins ant build, which works well. > > Im just curious, as I build some unofficial .NET versions of PDFBox in the past. > What PDFBox version did you build, 1.8.8 or trunk? What version of IKVM did you > use? > > BR > Andreas Lehmkühler > >> >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Tilman Hausherr <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >>> I've never used it. >>> >>> Isn't it needed for the users of IKVM ? >>> >>> Tilman >>> >>> Am 05.03.2015 um 20:46 schrieb John Hewson: >>> >>>> Based on discussions on the users lists, it looks like our ant build >>>> doesn’t actually produce working builds of PDFBox. I think we should remove >>>> the ant build in 2.0, we don’t need two build systems, and clearly none of >>>> us are maintaining it. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> — John >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
