Thank you, Andreas. I opened PDFBox-2856.
How about tiffs not being handled by ExtractImages...is this expected?
> I also noticed that the tiff file is no longer extracted (2.0.0 logger
> says tiff not handled, but a tiff is extracted with 1.8.9). Is this expected?
Thank you, again.
Best,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Lehmkuehler [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 3:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: migrating Tika to 2.0.0
Hi,
Am 07.07.2015 um 18:59 schrieb Allison, Timothy B.:
> All,
>
> As part of TIKA-1285, I updated Jeremy Anderson's original patch for our
> wrapper for PDFBox 2.0.0 on Tika. I'm having some problems running the unit
> tests because at least one of our files [0] is causing hefty resource
> utilization, which sends my laptop into paging. The parse does eventually
> stop, and content is extracted.
What version of PDFBox are you using, I guess the lastest SNAPSHOT?
> I also tried this file outside of Tika and used the straight PDFBox-app (
> both ExtractImages and ExtractText), and performance is also far, far slower
> when compared with 1.8.9.
I ran some quick tests and I can confirm that 2.0.0 is 4-5 times slower than
1.8.9 when extracting the text from the given pdf.
> Many apologies if this issue has already been identified.
AFAIK, it was unknown until now. Please create a JIRA ticket and thanks for
reporting.
>
> I also noticed that the tiff file is no longer extracted (2.0.0 logger
> says tiff not handled, but a tiff is extracted with 1.8.9). Is this expected?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Best,
>
> Tim
> [0]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12743988/testPDF_childAttachments.pdf
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
BR
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
