> On 9 Jul 2015, at 03:05, John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 6 Jul 2015, at 10:08, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes it would be great that the 2.0 version be released. Before the opening 
>> of the new Berlin airport.
>> 
>> IMO only the following issues are important for 2.0:
>> - PDFBOX-2301 - RandomAccessBuffer consumes too much memory - isn't that one 
>> done?
>> - PDFBOX-2370 - Move caching outside of PDResources - I assume John has a 
>> concept in his head, but hasn't implemented it
> 
> Indeed, I’ve implemented it today. Should speed up some files quite a bit.
> 
>> - PDFBOX-2423 - Page tree handling needs rewriting - only the page tree 
>> issues are important (if any remain), the transparency problems can be done 
>> later.
> 
> Page tree code is stable, so we can move the remaining transparency issues to 
> 2.1.

Actually the patch I have for these transparency issues requires breaking 
changes, so I’ll look into that soon.

— John

> 
>> - PDFBOX-2400 - Add insertPage() method - this is related to PDFBOX-2423
>> - PDFBOX-2705 - Add IKVM support to Maven build - when this was created, I 
>> thought this would be done quickly, but then nothing happened :-(
>> - PDFBOX-2340 - documentation - I suggest a wiki for the migration issues.
>> 
>> A release candidate is a good idea, hopefully the people who use 2.0 already 
>> without updating after every new commit can test their own applications.
> 
> We definitely want an RC, probably multiple. We need to set aside a time 
> window to encourage people to move to 2.0rc and take their feedback into 
> account w.r.t any APIs which require breaking changes to fix. Perhaps getting 
> a “big” user, such as Tika onboard will give us proof that 2.0 is ready for 
> production? Some APIs are still in flux, e.g. font mapping has undergone 
> recent changes to handle CJK better.
> 
> — John
> 
>> 
>> Tilman
>> 
>> Am 06.07.2015 um 11:55 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'd like to do a 2.0.0 release rather sooner than later and I guess I'm not 
>>> the
>>> only one ;-)
>>> 
>>> We are down to 24 issues marked with "Fix Version 2.0.0".
>>> 
>>> @Assignees: please have a look at "your" issues and verify if we really 
>>> should
>>> wait for them to be resolved first or if those could be moved to a later 
>>> release
>>> (2.1.0 or 3.0.0)
>>> 
>>> To start with a release candidate would be another option, but I'd prefer to
>>> release 2.0.0.
>>> 
>>> WDYT?
>>> 
>>> BR
>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
>> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org

Reply via email to