> On 9 Jul 2015, at 03:05, John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com> wrote: > > >> On 6 Jul 2015, at 10:08, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> wrote: >> >> Yes it would be great that the 2.0 version be released. Before the opening >> of the new Berlin airport. >> >> IMO only the following issues are important for 2.0: >> - PDFBOX-2301 - RandomAccessBuffer consumes too much memory - isn't that one >> done? >> - PDFBOX-2370 - Move caching outside of PDResources - I assume John has a >> concept in his head, but hasn't implemented it > > Indeed, I’ve implemented it today. Should speed up some files quite a bit. > >> - PDFBOX-2423 - Page tree handling needs rewriting - only the page tree >> issues are important (if any remain), the transparency problems can be done >> later. > > Page tree code is stable, so we can move the remaining transparency issues to > 2.1.
Actually the patch I have for these transparency issues requires breaking changes, so I’ll look into that soon. — John > >> - PDFBOX-2400 - Add insertPage() method - this is related to PDFBOX-2423 >> - PDFBOX-2705 - Add IKVM support to Maven build - when this was created, I >> thought this would be done quickly, but then nothing happened :-( >> - PDFBOX-2340 - documentation - I suggest a wiki for the migration issues. >> >> A release candidate is a good idea, hopefully the people who use 2.0 already >> without updating after every new commit can test their own applications. > > We definitely want an RC, probably multiple. We need to set aside a time > window to encourage people to move to 2.0rc and take their feedback into > account w.r.t any APIs which require breaking changes to fix. Perhaps getting > a “big” user, such as Tika onboard will give us proof that 2.0 is ready for > production? Some APIs are still in flux, e.g. font mapping has undergone > recent changes to handle CJK better. > > — John > >> >> Tilman >> >> Am 06.07.2015 um 11:55 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> I'd like to do a 2.0.0 release rather sooner than later and I guess I'm not >>> the >>> only one ;-) >>> >>> We are down to 24 issues marked with "Fix Version 2.0.0". >>> >>> @Assignees: please have a look at "your" issues and verify if we really >>> should >>> wait for them to be resolved first or if those could be moved to a later >>> release >>> (2.1.0 or 3.0.0) >>> >>> To start with a release candidate would be another option, but I'd prefer to >>> release 2.0.0. >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> BR >>> Andreas Lehmkühler >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
