Am 14.03.2016 um 21:52 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
Hi,
Am 14.03.2016 um 19:02 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
Am 14.03.2016 um 18:35 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
Hi,
a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.0/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/2.0.0/
The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
be199bb5c18d41275ad4b509dc488408dafa9f78.
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 2.0.0.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least three +1 PDFBox PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache PDFBox 2.0.0
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Here is my +1
+1 and thanks for the last minute work!
Unfortunately my last minute work seems to fix one half of the issue
only. :-(
So, the question is, should we continue with the vote and fix the
problem afterwards, or stop right now and restart the vote? I'm not
sure if it is severe enough or not. WDYT?
fix later. This problem has been there for at least a year and nobody
hit it until today.
TIlman
Tilman
BR
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
