[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15862431#comment-15862431
]
Maruan Sahyoun commented on PDFBOX-3667:
----------------------------------------
{quote}
Yes for a) although I wonder why not make this page related.
{quote}
Because a single field could be located at multiple pages. Wouldn't be the case
if that's only based on annotations but with AcroForm/Fields one could have
multiple annotations per field.
{quote}
About the rest - isn't there something already there which does the appearances
for some type of fields?
{quote}
No - we don't create appearances when we create a field from scratch. Something
I'd like to change. But as this is not defined in the standard I thought about
keeping it separate from the current PDmodel. So we do handle appearances if
there is an appearance stream but not from scratch.
> Handle Widget Annotations as Fields even if there is no AcroForm Fields entry
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PDFBOX-3667
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3667
> Project: PDFBox
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: AcroForm
> Affects Versions: 1.8.13, 2.0.4
> Reporter: Maruan Sahyoun
> Priority: Minor
>
> Some (mostly older) files have Widget Annotations but there is no
> AcroForms/Fields entry. PDFBox doesn't recognize these as form fields where
> Adobe Acrobat recognizes handles that. For a sample see PDFBOX-2003 and
> PDFBOX-3586.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]