[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16351709#comment-16351709
]
Tilman Hausherr commented on PDFBOX-4068:
-----------------------------------------
If you remove the setter then the no-args constructor doesn't have any value.
So I'd say yes remove both but remove the no-args constructor as well.
The risk is still there - one can call close() on the class itself... I
accidentally did this several times.
> Create ContentStream for XObject forms
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: PDFBOX-4068
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4068
> Project: PDFBox
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: PDModel
> Reporter: Tilman Hausherr
> Priority: Major
>
> We have a {{PDAppearanceContentStream}} for appearances but nothing for
> XObject forms.
> What we need should extend {{PDAbstractContentStream}} and should have a
> constructor like
> {code:java}
> public PDFormContentStream(PDFormXObject form) throws IOException
> {code}
> Alternatively, why not replace {{PDAppearanceContentStream}} ? Its parameter
> {{PDAppearanceStream}} is extended from {{PDFormXObject}} so we could just
> use the base class.
> We need this both for 2.0 and 3.* - we have users who have a really hard time
> fiddling with low level operators instead of using the methods.
> In 2.0 we could replace the parameter of {{PDPageContentStream}} that is
> currently {{PDAppearanceStream}}. This would be a non breaking change.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
