[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16763591#comment-16763591
 ] 

Osman commented on PDFBOX-4433:
-------------------------------

Okay, I am sorry, it is my bad. I am trying to sign a document with its content 
and form elements whose id is not excluded in the Fields dictionary. 

My aim is to sign a document with a form field whose id added in the lock 
fields (exclude list) array and after signing I want to change the value of 
that field and sign it again by not adding this id into the dictionary and 
after that, If I change the value of that field, the signature should be 
invalid. I hope that I was clear.

Tha case I am facing is the first signature is invalid.

I am asking that still here because in pdfbox's source code, I could not find 
anything like SigFieldLock or FieldMDP.

Is it really supported?

Regards

> PDF Form updating while signing
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PDFBOX-4433
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4433
>             Project: PDFBox
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Signing
>            Reporter: Osman
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: how-to
>
> Hi All,
> Actually I wanted to ask a question, I could not find the appropriate place 
> to ask. If there is a more appropriate place, please forward me.
> My question is that I want to sign documents in a sequence but between 
> signings, I want to change some fields which have their own signatures. It is 
> supported by PDF and until now I always used PDFBox but I could not achieve 
> it.
> Whenever I sign a document and change a field and sign again, previous 
> signature becomes invalid.
> How can I solve this problem?
> Regards



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to