[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16899493#comment-16899493
]
Maruan Sahyoun commented on PDFBOX-4617:
----------------------------------------
Given the form labels and the description it's not clear what would be the
expected behaviour
None of the radio buttons has the option no/yes assigned to it. So using no/yes
when setting the value won't work. I think from the comments that's also not
expected.
Given that some of the labels are used for multiple radio buttons would it be
expected that setting the value of one of the 'choice: yes' selects all of
them? If that is the case there is one setting missing - to select in unison.
For the possible opt values of the group the information is given (off, 0,
Choice2).
To get the information for individual ones one would need to expect the setting
of the /Kids
Obviously there is an issue here as the current code works under the assumption
that Radio buttons are selected in unison which isn't the case here
> PDButton.setValue and PDButton.getOnValueForWidget cannot handle radios with
> duplicate names and choices
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PDFBOX-4617
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4617
> Project: PDFBox
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: AcroForm
> Affects Versions: 2.0.16
> Reporter: Rosalind Douglas
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: Radio buttons with duplicate names and choices.pdf
>
>
> Hello, thank you for all of your efforts in building and maintaining PDFBox.
> We use it extensively for parsing PDFs, programmatically setting values and
> flattening PDFs for print.
> BUG: When we parse the attached PDF, the onvalues for the radio buttons are
> 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, which are determined by PDButton.getOnValueForWidget. Later
> on, when we try to programmatically set the value of the radio buttons
> (PDField.setValue) using the above onvalues, we receive this error:
> {code:java}
> 2019-07-31 08:59:36 ERROR (Prism.java:3744)- STACK:
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: value '1' is not a valid option for the
> field radio1, valid values are: [no, yes] and Off at
> org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.interactive.form.PDButton.checkValue(PDButton.java:376)
> ~[pdfbox-2.0.16.jar:2.0.16] at
> org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.interactive.form.PDButton.setValue(PDButton.java:158)
> ~[pdfbox-2.0.16.jar:2.0.16]
> {code}
> The radio buttons all have the same name, with either "yes" or "no" as the
> choice value. We would expect it to behave like Adobe DC, which allows the
> user to select any of the buttons regardless of whether they have the same
> choice or not. I am on PDFBox 2.0.16.
> Though my example might seem trivial, it's very easy for our PDF creating
> users to do this because copying and pasting fields is the easiest way to
> build a PDF.
> PROPOSED FIX:
> This might be a regression caused by PDFBOX-3391. In our code, we have
> overridden the PDButton.setValue method so that it always invokes
> updateByValue(value) rather than sometimes using updateByOption(value). Here
> is the code that works for us, from PDButton.setValue(String value):
>
> {code:java}
> @Override public void setValue(String value) throws IOException {
> checkValue(value);
> updateByValue(value);
> applyChange(); }
> {code}
>
> One caveat is that the change would probably break your PDFBOX-3391 fix, but
> perhaps there's some way to have them live side by side. I don't know very
> much about the other problem.
> Thanks again,
> Rosalind
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
