[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17141377#comment-17141377
 ] 

Alfred commented on PDFBOX-4883:
--------------------------------

Hi Andreas,

I have tested the new code with the document that was exhibiting the problem in 
PDFBOX-1778.
The result is as expected, you can see the concentric black circles.

This is the result: [^extreme-values-out.pdf]
I used the WriteDecodedDoc to test. Is that a relevant test?

thanks,
Alfred

> COSFloat is extremely slow
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: PDFBOX-4883
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4883
>             Project: PDFBox
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: PDModel
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.20, 3.0.0 PDFBox
>            Reporter: Alfred
>            Assignee: Andreas Lehmkühler
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: display, optimization, parsing, textextraction
>         Attachments: After.png, Before.png, 
> Faster_COSFloat_PDFBOX-4883.patch, PDFBOX-4883.patch, extreme-values-out.pdf
>
>
> I am testing text extraction from PDF and profiling the execution.
> I found that biggest time consumer is the COSFloat class.
>  
> All other improvements I suggested so far are small compared to this.
> But this is the also the most complex one.
>  
> I have attached te profiler output for the same text extraction, with and 
> without the COSFloat changes.
> The time to extract the same text was 4 times long with the original COSFlow, 
> because of its use of BigDecimal.
> I will try to write extra tests for all cases I see in the original COSFLoat 
> code, if they are not already tested.
> Then I will submit for review a new COSFloat version.
>  
> I think this affects parsing and displaying PDFs too, not just text 
> extraction.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to