It's really just the name - I tested 2.0.29 against 2.0.30.SNAPSHOT.
Btw this new SO question looks like a bug to me:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77376559/pdfbox-version-3-0-0-splitter-class-nullpointerexception-at-org-apache-pdfbox-co
Tilman
On 28.10.2023 17:02, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote:
Am 28.10.23 um 13:12 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.29_vs_3.0.0.tar.xz
Thanks for running the test, but I'm a little bit puzzled about the
file name. According to the stacktraces in A and B I guess you've
compared 2.0.29 and 2.0.30 and not 2.0.29 and 3.0.0?
Tilman
On 23.10.2023 19:11, Tilman Hausherr wrote:
+1 for both.
I can do a regression test for 2.0.29 / 2.0.30 but not today, but
hopefully I'll start until saturday.
I don't expect any surprised because I did a regression test not
long ago in connection with the extraction of Korean documents.
Tilman
On 22.10.2023 19:37, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to cut the 2.0.30 release in a week from now, on Monday or
Tuesday.
A week later I'd like to go for the first 3.0 bugfix release 3.0.1
WDYT?
@Tim, @Tilman do you have the time to run the extraction tests?
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
