[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18043142#comment-18043142
 ] 

Tilman Hausherr commented on PDFBOX-5648:
-----------------------------------------

No, IIRC the problem was that MapBackedGsubData changed. I tried with a second 
constructor but this didn't work, maybe because internally all maps are the 
same type. However this is a higher class implementing an interface, so we 
could create a different implementation. So I looked for "Map<List<Integer>, 
List<Integer>>" and then I found the interface ScriptFeature. That one has 
getReplacementForGlyphs() which returned a single integer in 3.0 and a list in 
the trunk.

> Support GSUB LookupType 2 (Multiple Substitution Format 1), part 2
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PDFBOX-5648
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5648
>             Project: PDFBox
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: FontBox
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0
>            Reporter: Tilman Hausherr
>            Assignee: Tilman Hausherr
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: gsub
>             Fix For: 4.0.0
>
>
> This table is the reverse of ligatures, i.e. replace one glyph with several 
> glyphs. I don't know if this is useful at all for us, except understanding 
> the current implementation.
> This will be implemented in two steps. The first step has been done in 
> PDFBOX-5603 which is reading these tables. This is the second step, actually 
> doing anything with it. 
> MapBackedGsubData has a Map<List<Integer>, Integer> which is not useful here. 
> Either we'd have to introduce a second map, or extend the map so that the 
> value is also a list.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to