I do not think it worth to have a beta release for a minor release? If this release contains big changes, I think we should bump the major version? Maybe call it 3.0.0? Then we could have alpha1, alpha2, ..., then beta1, beta2, ..., then the final release. But notice that, if it is a 'release', it must be 'formal', which means you should get at least 3 binding +1s.
If you want developpers to help testing, you can try to publish nightly builds on jenkins? Thanks. Tao Wu <wutao.as.nevercha...@gmail.com> 于2020年9月14日周一 下午7:48写道： > Ok, I'm afraid I misunderstood the merit of releasing... > > I thought the value of RC1 is that our community users are able to test it, > instead of > waiting until we officially announce that release with all issues fixed > perfectly. > I supposed it would receive no vote at the beginning. Maybe I should call > it > 2.1.0-beta1 and release it in an informal discussion thread. > > I will call for a vote of RC2 next time and fix the building issues. > Sorry for this mistake. > Thank you for your reminding. > > Regards > Tao Wu > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2020年9月14日周一 下午6:31写道： > > > What do you mean by 'This issue will be fixed in the next candidate. '? > > What we vote here is the 2.1.0 release, once the vote passed, 2.1.0-RC1 > > will be 2.1.0. Otherwise you need to cut 2.1.0-RC2, 2.1.0RC3, etc. > > So in general, you should say 'This issue will be fixed in the next > > release. ' > > > > But for me, I'm -1 on this RC if we can not build it from the downloaded > > source. You do not publish binaries in your release, and users can not > > build the binaries through the published sources, then what is the value > of > > the release? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Tao Wu <wutao.as.nevercha...@gmail.com> 于2020年9月14日周一 下午6:25写道： > > > > > Hello Pegasus devs! > > > > > > The Pegasus team is happy to announce the Apache Pegasus 2.1.0-RC1. > > > > > > Apache Pegasus 2.1.0 is a feature release that offers many features and > > > improvements since the prior release. > > > > > > This is a source-only release. The artifacts have been staged here: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pegasus/2.1.0/rc1/ > > > As a known issue, this release candidate can not be built directly from > > the > > > downloaded source artifact. Because in the current building process, > the > > > source must be a git repo. This issue will be fixed in the next > > candidate. > > > You can temporarily test out this release via git clone. > > > > > > It is tagged in Git as 2.1.0-RC1 and the corresponding hash is the > > > following: > > > > > > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-pegasus.git;a=commit;h=4f8db17808470a999b9a7c49d451ff6e957f15e6 > > > > > > The WIP release notes can be found here: > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ul5W0ViA6HK0h4blu3PD2JKnUR_8SSViHXQmmzHyew8/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > The KEYS file to verify the artifact signatures can be found here: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pegasus/KEYS > > > > > > The vote will run until Friday, Sep 18 18:00:00 PST 2020. > > > > > > Regards > > > Tao Wu > > > > > >
