On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 11:31 AM Daniel Schroeter <[email protected]> wrote: > Please correct me if i am wrong but i think the "scalafmt" and "new > package names" should be straight forward transformations that could be > applied to the scala3 branch as well. > This should not lead to a merge hell i believe. Wouldn't this also be a > possible approach?
In theory, it might work, can still be somewhat of a hassle which big changes like this. But I agree, if the Scala 3 merge is difficult or contentious, it should not hold up the rest of the process. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
