While I do like shorter package names, I lean slightly towards using "org.apache.pekko". It follows the established convention for Apache projects and the established reverse-DNS convention for Java/Scala projects in general. Also I think it's helpful to associate the project with Apache given that Pekko isn't yet a widely recognized name.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 2:41 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This issue could be contentious but it would be good to get agreement so > we can start making changes in the new git repos. > > There is discussion about the new package name for Scala/Java classes at: > > > https://github.com/mdedetrich/akka-apache-project/discussions/8#discussioncomment-3755587 > > A discussion among members of the Apache Incubator team can be found at: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/cjo86gdwvqlqslq68gd0c8hxq6ds6yrz > > I think it is fair to say that the vote is between 2 options: > * pekko > * org.apache.pekko > > I guess the aim would be to get people to vote for one or the other. > > If there are no objections to this approach, I can call a vote in a few > days. > > Ideally people would express their opinions in this thread and when the > vote is called, that mail email thread would just be for the votes. Even > while the vote thread is open, people can still add their voice to this > thread. > > Regards, > PJ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
