+1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Benedict de Detrich <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 10:08 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Enable mandatory single positive review for pull 
> requests in Pekko projects
>
> > I think we've been working that way informally, but it makes sense to
> implement a GH check. I'm assuming that the proposal is that the approval 
> needs to come from another project committer?
>
> While like the most of us I am a fan of patting myself on the back I would 
> say that counting self reviews would make this check largely pointless (so 
> yes, the idea is you need a positive > review from someone else).
> 
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 9:10 PM Sean Glover <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1
>
> I think we've been working that way informally, but it makes sense to 
> implement a GH check. I'm assuming that the proposal is that the 
> approval needs to come from another project committer?
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 9:09 AM Nicolas Vollmar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 there should be one review required
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 at 14:52, Claude Warren, Jr 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1  I didn't realize we were not working this way. ;)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 7:10 PM Matthew Benedict de Detrich 
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There were a couple of cases in the past where PR's were merged 
> > > > accidentally without having an actual positive review. How do 
> > > > people
> > feel
> > > > about preventing PR's from being merged unless they have at 
> > > > least one positive review (with no changes requested)? Note that 
> > > > I am
> > specifically
> > > > only asking for a positive review and not other options (such as
> always
> > > > requiring a branch to be updated with main) since due to the 
> > > > volume
> of
> > > pull
> > > > requests we have now this can become quite counter productive.
> > > >
> > > > Personally as a minimum bar I find this quite acceptable, we can
> always
> > > > increase it/add more checks later down the road as the process
> > progresses
> > > > (i.e. there is an argument for having Pekko core project have 2
> > positive
> > > > reviews rather than one due to how critical it is).
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Matthew de Detrich
> > > >
> > > > *Aiven Deutschland GmbH*
> > > >
> > > > Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin
> > > >
> > > > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
> > > >
> > > > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen
> > > >
> > > > *m:* +491603708037
> > > >
> > > > *w:* aiven.io *e:* [email protected]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Sam Byng 
Software Engineer 
Azure For Operators 
[email protected] 




Reply via email to