As a future simple consumer of Apache Pekko, i'd would love anything that
gets a published release sooner than later as our corporate governance is
on our necks about using akka (even the last o/s variant) because of the
license change. We  have 1 year from the announcement (sept 23) to resolve.

Granted you likely don't care all that much about what one consumer thinks,
but i wouldn't be surprised if others are in similar situations.

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 5:54 AM Nicolas Vollmar <nvoll...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I assume overall there weren't any (major) changes to public APIs for Scala
> 3, so merging it for 1.0.0 would be a small risk, but also reduce burden of
> maintaining the branch and allow to ship Scala 3 support across the board
> with 1.0.0. I'd +1 that.
>
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 at 13:26, PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to pitch the idea of just merging the pekko-http scala3 support
> > to main branch when it is ready and including this in the v1.0.0 release.
> > We have already made small-ish changes like using Parboiled jar and
> > upgrading Jackson.
> >
> > The scala3 changes don't make significant changes to the APIs and it
> feels
> > like adding the scala3 support now would not make migration from Akka
> HTTP
> > much harder. Akka HTTP has released scala3 support (BSL licensed) but the
> > release seems to have gone smoothly - without much user complaint.
> Nothing
> > significant had to be documented about the migration to Akka HTTP 10.4
> [1].
> >
> > My main reason for supporting an early merge of this is that it will save
> > us a whole circle of releases downstream. A scala3 support pekko-http
> > v1.1.0 would lead to new releases for pekko-connectors and other
> downstream
> > projects.
> >
> > I get that we want to make migration to v1.0.0 easy but I don't think the
> > scala3 changes make this significantly harder.
> >
> > If we had made faster progress with the v1.0.0 release then being
> > conservative probably makes sense but now that we still don't have a
> > release scheduled, it feels like we might be better off planning to get a
> > slightly bigger v1.0.0 release done and saving ourselves the hassle of
> > having to do a v1.1.0 release for the scala3 changes.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://doc.akka.io/docs/akka-http/current/migration-guide/migration-guide-10.4.x.html#general-notes
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to