> ===== START OF BALLOT === > > stream: fix regression in JsonFraming > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/44> #44 opened on Nov 14, > 2022 by jrudolph > • Changes requested > > +1
> Provide an automated migration to migrate from akka to pekko > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/22> nice-to-have > (low-prio) > #22 opened on Nov 5, 2022 by danischroeter > -1 Nice to have can be added later > Enable github status checks for CI > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/23> > #23 opened on Nov 6, 2022 by mdedetrich > -1 As noted in the ticket the system needs to quiesce before we can really implement this. It should be placed in the milestone 2 list. > > need to build source distributions > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/78> > #78 opened on Dec 23, 2022 by pjfanning > +1 Give it a best shot, ticket does not need to close before milestone1 is complete. In fact it should probably close when milestone 1 completes. > Automate the release <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/85> > #85 opened on Jan 5 by pjfanning > -1 This is a nice to have and as I argued on the dev list there is no way to automate the release until we know what the release process is. The only way to know the release process is to release. So for milestone1 this is an impossibility. > > > Remove references to Akka or Lightbend in the doc > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/98> > #98 opened on Jan 9 by jchapuis > +1 Give it a best shot, ticket does not need to close before milestone1 is complete. THis is something that should be identified as needing specific review during the RC review process. It should probably close when milestone 1 completes. Create a migration guide to migrate from Akka to Pekko > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/109> > #109 opened on Jan 17 by kw217 > -1 Nice to have but not necessary. Can be added later as a site documentation update. > Setup the release process > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/130> > #130 opened on Jan 26 by jrudolph > 9 tasks > +1 Needed to understand what we are releasing and what the process should be. This ticket should not close before Milestone1 completes. Figure out classes that need to be renamed for migration script > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/68> > #68 opened on Dec 3, 2022 by mdedetrich > -1 This is a nice to have with respect to RC1. Once we have RC1 writing the migration script and releasing it as v1.0.1 might make sense. Release early, release often. > Investigate how to scan for problematic licenses > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/151> high > priorityrequired for next release > #151 opened on Feb 8 by mdedetrich > +0 This issue is open but looks like it could be closed. I do note that Justin is correct in that most IPMC members will use RAT to scan for the headers, but that can be addressed as part of "Setup the release process" other source files to add licenses to > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/238> > #238 opened on Mar 9 by pjfanning > +1 Try to make sure we have all the licenses in place for the release. rewrite pekko-platform-guide to use pekko artifacts and to remove Akka refs > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/244> good first issue > Good for newcomershelp wantedExtra attention is needed > #244 opened on Mar 13 by pjfanning > -1 Not needed for RC1. Would be nice to have as part of v1.0.1 or similar close follow on. =act Refactory AsyncDnsResolver to fix the race condition of nextId() > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/288> > #288 opened on Apr 14 by He-Pin• Review required > +1 As work is done and just needs review. > Snapshot is missing LICENSE file > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/328> > #328 opened 1 minute ago by Claudenw > +1 will fail IPMC review otherwise. Snapshot missing NOTICE file > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/329> > #329 opened 5 minutes ago by Claudenw > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3AClaudenw> > +1 will fail IPMC review otherwise.
