Yes, if a method is removed then there must a migration tips been
documented.
何品


Matthew de Detrich <matthew.dedetr...@aiven.io.invalid> 于2023年8月4日周五
16:45写道:

> > In this thread, I am talking about code with annotations saying they
> are deprecated.
>
> > We have a new issue raised today and it can't proceed until we agree
> when it is safe to remove deprecated methods.
>
> In that case we are in broad agreement and I also agree with kerr's
> distinction, i.e.
>
> > I suggest we remove the deprecated things since Akka 2.5 in pekko 1.1.0 ,
> and remove those since Akka 2.6.x in pekko 1.2.0.
>
> With the proviso that there is an alternative to the deprecated method (if
> it's
> not immediately obvious) and if that's not the case we should properly
> document the alternative.
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 2:21 PM PJ Fanning <fannin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In this thread, I am talking about code with annotations saying they
> > are deprecated.
> >
> > We have a new issue raised today and it can't proceed until we agree
> > when it is safe to remove deprecated methods.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/526
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 12:58, Matthew de Detrich
> > <matthew.dedetr...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > Can we be a bit more prescriptive in this discussion thread? i.e. there
> > is
> > > a big
> > > difference between removing some methods which have have been annotated
> > > with @deprecated versus entire features such as classic remoting (I
> don't
> > > think there is any contention about the former).
> > >
> > > We also need to consider how CVE's change the equation, i.e. I don't
> > think
> > > it's a good faith argument to tell people to remain on older versions
> of
> > > Pekko
> > > to use features that have known CVE's especially since we spent effort
> in
> > > delaying the release because of CVE's (there is a bit of lack of
> > > consistency here).
> > >
> > > If we make this distinction between larger features and more trivial
> ones
> > > I think it's more appropriate to treat those said larger features on a
> > case
> > > by case basis (i.e. each having their own discussion thread and then a
> > > voting round if there is contention). If nothing else this will raise
> > > awareness of those features, Pekko is big and we inherited a lot from
> > > Akka so I think there is merit in at least having a high level
> > understanding
> > > of how much code is considered deprecated.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 1:27 PM PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Tying in with other discussions about what is permissible in the
> > > > 'improvements' release of Pekko core. It is tentatively called v1.1.0
> > > > but I suspect that we end up calling it v2.0.0 - if the changes are
> > > > big enough.
> > > >
> > > > I'm going to suggest that we should consider anything that was
> > > > deprecated before Akka 2.6.0 as fair game for removal in Pekko
> v1.1.0.
> > > >
> > > > Please feel free to suggest alternatives
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > PJ
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Matthew de Detrich
> > >
> > > *Aiven Deutschland GmbH*
> > >
> > > Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin
> > >
> > > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
> > >
> > > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen
> > >
> > > *m:* +491603708037
> > >
> > > *w:* aiven.io *e:* matthew.dedetr...@aiven.io
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Matthew de Detrich
>
> *Aiven Deutschland GmbH*
>
> Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin
>
> Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
>
> Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen
>
> *m:* +491603708037
>
> *w:* aiven.io *e:* matthew.dedetr...@aiven.io
>

Reply via email to