Hi PJ, sure, I can do the initial submission. My main point is that it only makes sense if the project is willing to take over the long-term maintainence.
Oliver Am Mi., 23. Aug. 2023 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org >: > Hi Olivier, > > Thanks for sharing your code. Are you planning on submitting that to > TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks ? > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 07:13, Oliver Trosien <o...@pocket-design.de> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > fair point. I have working code here (just the plain variant, not the one > > with slick from Lightbend), > > which is as you pointed out basically changing the imports plus doing a > bit > > of cleanup: > > https://github.com/otrosien/FrameworkBenchmarks/pull/1/ > > > > Main difference to the akka version is that it runs on JDK17. Feel free > to > > use this as a baseline. > > > > Regards, > > Oliver > > > > > > Am Di., 22. Aug. 2023 um 19:31 Uhr schrieb PJ Fanning < > fannin...@apache.org > > >: > > > > > Thanks Olivier. We have Pekko and Pekko HTTP releases that could be > > > benchmarked. The Akka code could probably be pretty easily forked and > > > used to create Pekko equivalents (mainly just changing the imports and > > > possibly some config names). > > > > > > I wouldn't expect there to be much difference between the Akka and > > > Pekko performance numbers. > > > > > > If someone has time to do the initial setup, it should be fairly > > > straightforward for us to maintain it going forward. > > > > > > For my part, I'm more interested in getting all the Pekko modules > > > released and helping to get widely used Akka ecosystem libs to support > > > Pekko too (or to create Pekko based forks). > > > > > > On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 at 18:10, Oliver Trosien <o...@pocket-design.de> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I wanted to ask the project team if they want to maintain an > > > implementation > > > > of the framework benchmark run for pekko (you can see the akka > > > > implementation here: (1)) > > > > > > > > I would totally understand if you'd object this kind of > "Benchmarketing", > > > > but it still would give the project some additional visibility. I do > > > have a > > > > local version which basically is a copy of the akka one. While there > are > > > > some framework submissions driven by individuals, they usually don't > have > > > > insights or long-term interest in maintaining these submissions and > as a > > > > result performance regressions can shed bad light on the project (2). > > > > > > > > They want to close submissions to the next round soon (3) - and it > > > usually > > > > only happens once a year, so we would need to be quick to get > included. > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Oliver > > > > > > > > (1) > > > > > > > > https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/tree/master/frameworks/Scala/akka-http > > > > (2) > > > > > > > > https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/issues/7475#issuecomment-1607479108 > > > > (3) > > > > > > > > https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/issues/7475#issuecomment-1684087157 > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org > >
