> Thanks, I wounder if we can do this with a dedicated action, which will
check/validate the staging jars ~

Afaik this is not allowed, you need a human to validate the jars. What can
be improved is
publishing staged jar's in a github action[1] but those jar's still need to
be manually checked
before approval

1: https://lists.apache.org/thread/yvhjz1l523kwpbybnjssn0d4kl6dgl1s

On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 1:18 PM kerr <hepin1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, I wounder if we can do this with a dedicated action, which will
> check/validate the staging jars ~
> 何品
>
>
> PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> 于2024年5月19日周日 18:13写道:
>
> > Thanks He Pin. I will release the jars.
> >
> > On Sun, 19 May 2024 at 08:18, kerr <hepin1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I checked it locally with basic usage, another thing is ,can we do it
> > with
> > > a dedicated github action:)
> > > 何品
> > >
> > >
> > > Matthew de Detrich <mdedetr...@gmail.com> 于2024年5月16日周四 23:24写道:
> > >
> > > > I'll have a look tomorrow if it's not already done so
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 16 May 2024, 15:26 PJ Fanning, <fannin...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Would anyone have time to look at validating the 1.1.0-M1 jars.
> This
> > is
> > > > the
> > > > > last step required to complete the release.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 21:01, PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Pekko 1.1.0-M1 (RC1) vote has passed so we can proceed with
> the
> > > > > > release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have uploaded the 1.1.0-M1 jars to repository.apache.org
> staging
> > > > repo.
> > > > > > The 1.1.0-M1-RC1 jars are still there for comparison.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will leave the jars there for at least 24 hours. Our process
> > > > > > requires that at least 1 PMC member reviews the jars before we
> can
> > > > > > release them.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/pekko/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > PJ
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to