We're running Pekko with Pekko Management in Kubernetes on OpenJDK 21
(previously 17) without issues.

On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 at 13:03, Sharath Reddy <
sharath.reddy.boyapa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Kerr,
>
> I mean that the JDK versions supported by Pekko Management do not include
> OpenJDK 17.
> Apache Pekko Management · Apache Pekko Management
> <
> https://pekko.apache.org/docs/pekko-management/current/pekko-management.html#project-info
> >
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 3:04 PM kerr <hepin1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What do you mean it doesn't support Java 17?
> >
> > 何品
> >
> >
> > PJ Fanning <fannin...@gmail.com> 于2024年6月18日周二 17:24写道:
> >
> > > Hi Sharath,
> > > We don't run CI testing for Java 17. At the same time, the Java team
> > > are very careful about compatibility in their releases.
> > > Have you tried running with Java 17? If not, could you try? If you
> > > find some issues, could you report them as bugs?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > PJ
> > >
> > > On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 at 07:15, Sharath Reddy
> > > <sharath.reddy.boyapa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello Pekko Community,
> > > >
> > > > We are currently using Akka 2.6.x and planning to migrate to Pekko.
> > > > However, we've encountered an issue: **pekko-management** doesn't yet
> > > > support JDK 17. We'd appreciate any insights or workarounds from the
> > > > community.
> > > >
> > > > 1. **Current Setup**:
> > > >    - Akka version: 2.6.x
> > > >    - JDK: 17
> > > >
> > > > 2. **Questions**:
> > > >    - Has anyone successfully migrated from Akka to Pekko with JDK 17?
> > > >    - Are there any known compatibility issues?
> > > >    - Is there a recommended approach for handling this situation?
> > > >
> > > > Any advice, experiences, or pointers would be greatly appreciated!
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > Sharath
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to