I'm +1 for the release a 1.1.3 -rc 1 for the users to tests


何品


PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> 于2025年1月2日周四 22:17写道:

> If there are no objections, I would like to press on with an RC for
> v1.1.3. The milestone [1] has the changes.
>
> I would prefer not to add more to the patch as it already has a few
> changes. If a high impact bug turns up, then I'd happily consider it but
> the existing PRs look like nice to haves and not high impact issues.
>
> My preference for the nice to haves is for us to do a v1.2.0-M1 release in
> the next fews weeks or months. There is an ongoing discussion about making
> bigger changes like removing deprecated code and dropping support for older
> Java and Scala versions. That would delay the M1 and maybe we should hold
> off on dropping stuff until we have a bigger discussion [2].
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/pekko/milestone/13?closed=1
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rzylygg5jrh5dhgbpczr6p7nzgq56vy9
>
>
> On 2024/12/17 19:17:22 PJ Fanning wrote:
> > There were problems with the Pekko/Akka cluster support so we need to
> delay the release. There is ongoing work for this. We'll probably try to
> put a release together in January.
> >
> > On 2024/12/12 11:05:24 PJ Fanning wrote:
> > > We only need PR1578 if we want to support Akka nodes that are running
> > > with versions older than 2.6.5. The problem is that if we sort out the
> > > fromBinary, we may also need to update toBinary (I haven't done a
> > > thorough analysis of toBinary). Do we really want to support Akka pre
> > > v2.6.5?
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1578
> > >
> > > I'm happy to backport PR1423 to v1.0.x branch if the feeling is that
> > > we want Akka users to go to Pekko 1.0.x first.
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1423
> > >
> > > On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 at 10:38, Arnout Engelen <enge...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 1:52 PM PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > I think we have the Pekko/Akka mixed cluster changes that we need
> and they are ready for release.
> > > >
> > > > Don't we still need https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1578 ?
> > > >
> > > > > I updated the doc relating to this and include the Known Issues
> that have come to light recently.
> > > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PEKKO/Pekko+Akka+Compatibility
> > > >
> > > > Great!
> > > >
> > > > > Pekko 1.1 has an additional change to support Akka migrations so I
> think it is best to focus on this release over a new Pekko 1.0.4 release.
> Another option might be to backport the additional PR that never made it
> into a Pekko 1.0.x release.
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1423
> > > > >
> > > > > The docs are now updated to say that Pekko only works with Akka
> nodes of version 2.6.5 and above. The details of why are in the
> Pekko+Akka+Compatibility doc.
> > > >
> > > > This question boils down to: do we want to tell people who are
> migrating to
> > > > a) first migrate to Pekko 1.0.x and then to 1.1.x, or
> > > > b) migrate directly to 1.1.x?
> > > >
> > > > Telling them to migrate directly to 1.1.x may be more difficult as
> > > > we've updated dependencies there, diverging more from Akka. On the
> > > > other hand, the number of cases that *really* need a zero-downtime
> > > > cluster migrations is likely small, so it makes sense that that will
> > > > be more complicated. I'm in favour of focusing on 1.1 (telling people
> > > > to migrate directly to 1.1.x instead of going through 1.0.x)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > >
> > > > Arnout
> > > >
> > > > > On 2024/11/27 14:37:36 Arnout Engelen wrote:
> > > > > > I don't think there needs to be a particular rush, we can ask
> people
> > > > > > who want to migrate clusters from akka to pekko to update to
> 1.0.x
> > > > > > first. (I thought we discussed that that might be the
> > > > > > wise/conservative thing to do anyway, but can't find a reference
> right
> > > > > > now. If so we should mention that at
> > > > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PEKKO/Pekko+Akka+Compatibility
> ).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It might be nice to do a release. I'm ok with these changes
> going into
> > > > > > 1.1.3. https://github.com/apache/pekko/discussions/1566 might
> be worth
> > > > > > looking into before we do, but we shouldn't let it hold things
> up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Arnout
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 10:25 PM PJ Fanning <
> fannin...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can I ping everyone on this? We have a bug that I think we
> want to release the fix for.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1562
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have also tested building various Pekko Persistence
> implementations (JBDC, Cassandra, etc.) and found that they are still build
> ok with the latest Pekko snapshots despite the changes in:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1518
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm still on the fence as to whether 1518 should be removed
> and delayed till a Pekko 1.2.0 release. If there are no strong objections,
> it still feels better to just proceed with the 1.1.3 release and include
> this change.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 2024/11/10 12:54:42 PJ Fanning wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think it would be a good idea to release v1.1.3 of the
> core Pekko libs.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The milestone is:
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pekko/milestone/13?closed=1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This revert fixes an edge case.
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1526
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There are a couple of new methods in pekko-persistence-typed
> but I
> > > > > > > > think they are ok.
> > > > > > > >
> https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1518/files#diff-9c896065f6ff551b450ec29d1e606971183c36dd03799330b3494372359ddaeb
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Does anyone have any objections? I can release manage but if
> anyone
> > > > > > > > wants to volunteer, I can assist.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Arnout Engelen
> > > > > > ASF Security Response
> > > > > > Apache Pekko PMC member, ASF Member
> > > > > > NixOS Committer
> > > > > > Independent Open Source consultant
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Arnout Engelen
> > > > ASF Security Response
> > > > Apache Pekko PMC member, ASF Member
> > > > NixOS Committer
> > > > Independent Open Source consultant
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to